WP2-SLIDE5-PRAC.

• “Making Sense” of Scholarly Journal Article #1
  
  
  Research Question(s): What research question(s) is this scholar investigating? What question(s) is driving their study?  What are they hoping to answer/address in this piece? Are there hypotheses/predictions that are driving this study?  If so, what are they?
  Do Americans Want a Right to be Forgotten?

  Can privacy policy protect us one hundred precent when we share information on the internet?
  fundamental right to access to information
  Right to be forgotten may be work for people who want to protect all their information tightly.
  

• Conceptual Definitions/Descriptions: How has this researcher defined or described some of the major concepts/keywords in this study?
  
  
  Demographics—including gender, race, age, and partisan identification—are often associated with political attitudes and behaviors (Verba, Schlozman, & Brady, 1995).
  The researcher uses examples to define a keyword
  
  

• Methods and Instruments: How did the researcher(s) investigate that question?  How did they conduct this study? What variables did they study?  What kind of data did they collect? What kind of instruments (e.g., survey, interview questions) did they use to collect data?  Can you offer examples of questions that they asked?
  
  
  The researchers use the data of information use and opinion and descriptive statistics for each measure. And they had two measures related to attitudes about inforamtion online--"information securitity" and "Online confidence" which help researcher to analyse the situation when people use internet and their attitude.
   
  

• Key Findings/Results: What did thi researcher find out?  What discoveries did they make?
  67.1 percent support or strongly support it, whereas only 13 percent oppose or strongly oppose it. And "women are more supportive of the law offering a right to be forgotten than are men—70.3 percent of women support the proposed law"
  Also,attitudes about government control also predict support for the law.

• Argument: In a sentence or two, what new knowledge is this writer is trying to move forward?  What’s the big take-away? What are they trying to persuade their readers of? Hint #1: consider including a keyword(s), especially if it’s embedded within the piece.  Hint #2: the abstract and conclusion typically offer summaries that capture the gist of the whole piece.
  
  
  The writer is trying to move the fundation of "right to be forgotten" forward. And also he makes people think about their information securitity.